Oct 8, 2004
There is no " all of the above " option, I'd like you to the one you think fits best.....
hah - I am the first therefore according to how the poll currently stands i am 100% right
I see 4 homicidal maniacs and one misguided power hungry moron.
Just don't know which one I despise more...
none of them are exactly the most friendly or conducive to world peace kind-of-guys. nor the sort of person you'd want round for a quiet cuppa. in fact they're all the kind of people you might want the vicar to give a stern talking to about what jesus / mohammed was ACTUALLY on about
But that wasn't the question being posed.....
Yes, yes, I know, but for the sake of this experiment, I want to know who *YOU* think fits THE MOST.
( I did make that clear grumble grumble, I will explain later on when I have a better sample group grumble grumble )
My choice is the representative of a collection of such individuals. The rest are also pawns
I forgot about this, so here we are.
It was of course Mr President Bush, describing his ol' buddy Mr Saddam Husein.
I made the post ( a while ago now ! ), as I had had just about enough of all the retorical bullshit that that twat comes out with, time and time again.
I mean, does it take a genius to point out that perhaps it might be the person that controls the largest nulclear arse-nel on the planet, and has refused to play down the nukes ( disregard of non-proliforation treaty ) that might have a bit of a nuke habbit ?
Every time he gets up there on his pulpit and goes on about : "the evildoers ", " the turrists" , "those that would take our freedoms ".....
It just makes me want to run up to him and punch his Fcking stupid shit face in ARGHGHGHGcuntAHGHGHG !!
Needed a rant.
We gotta take a stand against the evildoers.......
There are those that would take our freedoms.....
So this thread isn't about Jackie Chan films then. Oh poo. :sad:
Proof that Urks headlines need some serious work
Separate names with a comma.